While Michael Brown was deemed too dangerous to live, another man in Dallas set fires so that he could shoot police and firefighters who responded, and HE was taken into custody unharmed and perfectly alive. Spoiler alert: he was white. (source)
Fox News jumped to paint Michael Brown as a criminal for allegedly stealing cigars in this video, meanwhile the man who terrorized Dallas and shot multiple officers was given a chance to defend his reasons as NBC published an article painting him as a human who was making a respectable political statement.
The town of Ferguson, Missouri is 67 percent African-American. Their police force is over 96 percent white. (source)
This sort of thing happens often; 4 other unarmed black men were killed by police this month in the USA: Eric Garner(NY), John Crawford(OH), Ezell Ford(CA), and Dante Parker(CA) (source). Black women and girls are also regularly killed by police, see the stories of Yvette Smith(TX), Eleanor Bumpurs(NY), Aiyana Stanley-Jones(MI), and Tarika Wilson(OH). It happens even in "nice places": police officers have shot unarmed black men and women in Hollywood, Riverside (California), and Prince Georges County—a Maryland suburb known as the most affluent US county with an African-American majority. (source)
The ACLU sued to get a copy of Ferguson's police report covering the shooting, but it was "mostly blank" and did not contain any info like a description of the scene, quotes from eyewitnesses, names of the officers involved, or any other pieces of information normally found on such documents. (source)
German reporters covering the protests afterwards (it's international news) said that Ferguson officers were worse to deal with than covering conflict zones in Georgia, the Gaza strip, Kaliningrad/the Soviet Union, Iraq, Vietnam, China, and Cuba. Police here would not let them take any pictures and they got arrested. (source)
Ferguson police also threatened to kill American journalists covering the protests. (source)
Though the Grand Jury is not even sure they will charge Darren Wilson with anything, Darren Wilson has raised over $234,000 for his legal defense at Gofundme. Michael Brown's family has raised only $168,000. (source)
A 14-year old in Lilburn, Georgia, was so bothered by our epidemic of police violence that he designed an app for it.
After that, Obama decided he also was alarmed and ordered a review of our militarized police system. Racism or race was not mentioned even once in the 1,382 word New York Times article covering his statement.
Last January, low-income residents of San Francisco were REALLY MAD at the Google buses using their bus stops. Why? They viewed these buses as symbols of gentrification and
displacement in a city where the rapid growth of the tech sector has
driven up their rent. And Google wasn't paying anyone anything to use the bus stops, but they were getting in the way of their regular buses, causing delays and overcrowding at the bus stops. Imagine, seeing your own public transit cutback due to budget cuts, while some dude in a suit takes your spot in the bus shelter to wait for his fancy-pants Google shuttle that you can't even ride.
So, angry protestors began blocking the tech company's buses from leaving the stops. Google employees got so disturbed, some of them even called this a hate crime.
But, these protests actually produced a REAL BENEFIT:
January 21, 2014, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (also known as MUNI) imposed a fee of $1 per day for each public stop used by a private
company. This fee was expected to raise $1.5 million a year and was
the agency could impose without a vote from San Francisco residents! Then in February, Google donated $6.8 million to the transit agency to
provide free public transit for low-income children in San
It's interesting that both the local government and Google here were influenced by the protestors, unlike other protests we've seen in the past, who get ignored or even fined.
The Invisible Hand in the USA might as well mean "invisible influence of money on our political reps." Especially when you consider that most corporate spending on elections here is secret information.
Sometimes though, you can see how the money affects the outcome of political process. When a policy gets passes that the majority of the public disagrees with, you can bet it's that "Invisible Hand of Elite Interest" at work:
Consider the Merchant's House Museum in New York City. This historical museum, a historical preservation society,
and thousands of neighborhood residents don't want another "drab on so many
levels" hotel to be built in their neighborhood. The hotel construction
is guaranteed to damage the neighboring museum and put it out of
service for 1 year or more, and require repairs costing $1 million+. We know this because the same thing happened in the 1980s with another for-profit construction project.
Yet the government body responsible, the NYC "Landmarks Preservation
Commission," voted 6-1 to approve the construction with NO guarantees or
compensation to the Merchant House museum. So the hotel makes a huge
profit at the cost of the neighborhood identity, education, and culture.
And the museum might be out of business forever.
The Invisible Hand is said to maximize value and opportunity because market forces guide resources to be used in the most efficient manner. But who's opportunity is being maximized here? Not the local community, that's for sure.
Well, I'm not sure I'll have much to make fun of here anymore. Princeton researchers have exposed the US government for the sham it is, publishing a report that says,"The US is dominated by a rich and powerful elite."
They supported it with tons of academic stats, like "Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence."
And nightmarish numbers like, USA elites get their policies enacted 18% to 45% of the time, even when the majority of Americans disagree with them. So this small percent can make a law happen even if 85% of the country is against it. So much for "one man, one vote."
Now that everyone knows our masses are ruled by the monied elites, how can I be ironic about US "Democracy?"
Well, this article was only published by the BBC, so perhaps most Americans still don't know. So maybe Liberal Propaganda will still have a market after all!
Thanks, American Oligarchy & your carefully-controlled media!
Gawker recently bragged that Japanese people have been notably selfless after their earthquake distaster, returning over (the equivalent of) $70 MILLION dollars in cash to it's rightful owners. By cutting open safes that washed up on shore, turning in lost wallets & purses found in the rubble to the police, ect.
One commenter complained that praising the Japanese for this altruism is romanticizing and racist:
But ColdBloodedSerialCommenter seems to have missed the point. In Japan, savings are more commonly stored in cash AND their population is less desperate and less impoverished than the USA, as he admitted when he said "is it especially remarkable for people to return lost property in a
developed nation with universal education, robust law enforcement, and
extensive social support structures?" Because yea, that sounds nothing like the USA to me. While technically we do have public schools and law enforcement, are school quality is hardly consistent across neighborhoods and a free high school degree is not enough to get a good job, most ppl have to pay for higher education if they want a salaried job. And don't even get me started on law enforcement...
In America, people would never turn in large quantities of cash like
this. Our law enforcement SEIZES cash when it's found, more often than
not, and holds it as "Evidence," never returning it to anyone. And the
average person would the money too if they found it, not turn it in to
the authorities (because the authorities would just keep the cash anyway.)
yea, it's not romanticization to point out that Japan is vastly
different. And maybe it's partially BECAUSE they don't have the
desperation and corruption that USA does...we don't really HAVE universal
education, healthcare or a good standard of living. And we have a
high amount of corruption in government and law enforcement. See how these things make a difference when a crisis hits.