extreme proposal that allows companies that hold our very sensitive information to share it with any company or government entity they choose, even directly with military agencies like the NSA, without first stripping out personally identifiable information," said Michelle Richardson, legislative counsel at the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office.
House Representative Alan Grayson (Florida), tried to introduce a tiny amendment to make sure a warrant was required before companies had to hand over info. But "The Rules Committee wouldn’t even allow debate on requiring a warrant before a search."
Why would the House rush through such a controversial bill? Well, interest groups in support of the bill spent $605 MILLION DOLLARS lobbying Congress since 2011. That's 140 times as much as those who opposed the bill, who only spent $4.3m! Why count since 2011? Well that's when lobbying was allowed to get bigger than ever, because Citizens United vs. FCC had just taken off. (The ironically named Citizens United* was a conservative group who sued the Federal Election Comission to allow corporations political "rights" to bribe--I mean, lobby--Congress unlimited amounts of money for the first time in US history.)
* ironic because it should have been named Corporations United.
Podcasts Are The New Blog! (In My World, At Least!) - It’s been a while since I’ve blogged, and there’s a reason for it. I’ve fallen head over heels in love with podcasting, you guys. I launched Style Your Min...
1 week ago